Abeysekera, W V K M and Thorpe, A (1997) Standardisation or non-standardisation? The case of brickwork in Sri Lanka. In: Stephenson, P (ed.) Proceedings of 13th Annual ARCOM Conference, 15-17 September 1997, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract
'Standardisation' seeks 'single best' solutions to chaotic problems. However, these solutions are essentially 'static'. Moreover, unimplementable and inappropriate standards undermine their general usefulness and raise doubts as to their efficacy especially in an emerging future. Sri Lankan brickwork is characterised by irregular sizes of bricks, brickwork joints and wall widths. These walls which are plastered on both sides are mainly used as infills and partitions except for walls in single and two storey buildings carrying light loads. Internationally, standard wall widths are associated with standard brick sizes with a unique joint size of 10 mm. However, this study shows that 'standard width' walls may be built not necessarily of standard size bricks with a standard joint size of 10 mm, but with an endless variety of brick and joint sizes. This is made possible by varying the size of the wall joint and by a Sri Lankan practice known as 'chapparu' whereby the spaces created by the shortfall of the length or the breadth of a brick is filled by mortar to make the wall surfaces 'flat as a plate'. As such, this study advocates a paradigm shift from the conventional focus of the 'brick and the joint' to the 'wall and its width'. It proposes a methodology for the 'standardisation' of the wall width and decision rules for the 'non-standardisation' of the bed joint, concluding that both approaches are useful. Accordingly, this study calls for a seed change in the mind set of construction managers who specify and manage brickwork operations.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | brick; brickwork; chapparu; chaos; complexity; consensus; standardisation |
| Index terms: | brickwork, mortars (material), complexity, Sri Lanka, construction manager, paradigm, standardization, methodology |
| Subjects: | building materials, profession, systems engineering, research methods, performance measurement, architectural elements, education and knowledge transfer, Geography |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here