Alkass, S; Alhussein, M and Moselhi, O (1997) Computerized crane selection for construction projects. In: Stephenson, P (ed.) Proceedings of 13th Annual ARCOM Conference, 15-17 September 1997, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract
This paper describes a methodology for crane selection for construction projects. The methodology is incorporated into an integrated computer system capable of advising users on the selection of appropriate cranes for their construction projects. Expert's knowledge has been captured, classified and coded in the system's knowledge-base. The system integrates a knowledge-base with algorithmic programs, and commercially available tools such as: database management, spreadsheet applications, graphics and simulations. The system utilizes Object Oriented Programming characteristics of the abstraction, inheritance, modularity, and encapsulation of data. The system allows for the stored data and knowledge to be accessed by all parties involved in the crane selection process. It is also capable of facilitating user friendly interface. Description of the methods and current practices used for crane(s) selection for construction projects is also presented. A case example is presented, to demonstrate the effectiveness of the system.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | crane selection; integrated computer system; modularity; encapsulation of data |
| Index terms: | effectiveness, programming, methodology, construction project, program, database, modularity, spreadsheet, computer system |
| Subjects: | software systems, research methods, performance management, production management, data management, design flexibility, computing systems, programming, data science |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here