Liao, L; Teo Ai Lin, E and Low, S P (2020) Assessing building information modeling implementation readiness in building projects in Singapore: A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(3), pp. 700-724. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify critical non-value adding (NVA) building information modeling (BIM) implementation activities in current building project delivery process, develop a BIM implementation readiness (BIMIR) evaluation model, and assess BIMIR statuses in building projects in Singapore. Design/methodology/approach: A questionnaire survey and four post-survey interviews were conducted in Singapore. A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach was adopted in the model development. Findings: In total, 38 out of 44 NVA BIM implementation activities were deemed critical and used in the proposed model, among which “lack of involvement by contractors to contribute site knowledge” in the design development phase was ranked top. This model was validated in five projects. It was found that most of 73 surveyed building projects were in a low BIMIR status and the assessment results were consistent with current industry practices of BIM implementation in Singapore. Research limitations/implications: There may be geographical limitation on the identification of the critical NVA BIM implementation activities. However, because BIM mandate spreads globally, the findings can help overseas project teams customize their own NVA activities and evaluation models. Practical implications: As BIM implementation is mandated in Singapore, BIMIR evaluation helps local project teams identify weak areas of their BIM implementation activities and prioritize resources to enhance those areas. Originality/value: No tool has been developed for evaluating BIMIR at the project level in the construction industry in Singapore or at large in Asia. Four BIMIR statuses are defined, which are consistent with Singapore’s BIM guidelines and standards.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modelling; construction; process; project management |
| Index terms: | fuzzy synthetic evaluation, interview, mandate, survey, questionnaire, Asia, methodology, model development, Singapore, building information modelling, project delivery, project team, project management, implementation, construction industry, design development |
| Subjects: | project management theory and practice, design process, Geography, research methods, political science, information systems, industry analysis, decision-making and optimization, data collection methods, regions and continents, project delivery, analytical methods, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Procurement, Governance, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here