Impact of culture differences on performance of international construction joint ventures: The moderating role of conflict management

Liu, J; Cui, Z; Feng, Y; Perera, S and Han, J (2020) Impact of culture differences on performance of international construction joint ventures: The moderating role of conflict management. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(9), pp. 2353-2377. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: Cultural differences have been frequently cited as a major source of risks for international joint ventures (IJVs). Cultural differences may cause extensive conflicts in technology, norms and emotion among the international joint venture (IJV) partners. The purpose of this study is to explore the interactive effects of national culture differences (NCDs) and conflict management approaches on the performance of international construction joint ventures (ICJV). Design/methodology/approach: Data were collected using a questionnaire survey method with 143 valid responses. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to test the research hypotheses. Findings: It was found that ICJV performance declined with a high degree of NCDs. The negative effect of NCDs on ICJV performance was mitigated by adopting the cooperative conflict management approach; while it was aggravated by adopting the competitive conflict management approach. The findings may provide an alternative way (i.e. adopting the cooperative conflict management approach rather than avoiding or competitive approaches) to address the cultural conflicts in the multicultural project management teams. Practical implications: Firstly, as NCD negatively impacts performance of ICJVs, project managers should pay attention to cultural issues and learn how to manage them; Secondly, as cooperative and competitive conflict management approaches have different moderating effects on the relationship between NCD and ICJV performance, project managers must choose appropriate conflict management styles in multination teams. Thirdly, as the avoiding approach has no significant moderating effect on the negative relationship between NCD and ICJV performance, it is important for Chinese partners not to employ avoiding approach to deal with conflicts in ICJV. Originality/value: This study uniquely adds to the literature on cultural issues in managing ICJVs by integrating the moderating effects of conflict management approaches. The interactive effects of conflict management approaches and national cultural differences on ICJV project performance may contribute to the theories regarding conflict management theory in the context of cross-cultural management.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: conflict management; construction; cultural differences; international joint venture; project performance
Index terms: joint venture, project manager, project performance, international construction, national culture, conflict management, survey, structural equation modelling, project management team, cultural difference, questionnaire, methodology, norms, partial least square
Subjects: business, data collection methods, strategic management, profession, project management theory and practice, research methods, statistical analysis, cross-cultural studies, sociology, conflict resolution
Topics: Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, International Construction
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here