Lu, W; Tam, V W Y; Chen, H and Du, L (2020) A holistic review of research on carbon emissions of green building construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(5), pp. 1065-1092. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Addressing global warming challenge, carbon emissions reduction potential of the construction industry has received additional attentions. The decoupling of construction industry and carbon emissions through policies, technologies and model innovations is an effective way for reducing environmental pollution and achieve eco-urban target. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: Within the scope of green building carbon emissions (GB-CO2) research, a large number of scientific literature has been published in construction discipline over the past few decades. However, it seems that a systematic summary of strategies, techniques, models and scientific discussion of future direction of GB-CO2 is lacking. Therefore, this paper carries out data mining on authoritative journals, identified the key research topics, active research areas and further research trends through visualization studies. Findings: This study contributes to the body of knowledge in GB-CO2 by critically reviewing and summarizing: professional high-quality journals have a greater influence in the scope of research, developed countries and developing countries are all very concerned about sustainable buildings, and the current hot topics of research focus on the application of the life cycle models, energy efficiency, environmental performance of concrete material, etc. Moreover, further research areas that could expand the knowledge of cross-national long-term carbon mechanisms, develop comprehensive life cycle carbon emissions assessment models, build technical standards and tests for the sustainable building material and systems, and exploit multi-objective decision models considering decarbonizing design and renewable energy. Originality/value: This study is of value in systematic insight the state-of-the-art of GB-CO2 research in the more recent decade. A more vividly and effectively method is documented in extending the traditional bibliometric review to a deeper discussion. This study can also benefit construction practitioners by providing them a focused perspective of strategy and technologies innovations for emerging practices in green building projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | carbon emissions; green building; literature review; science mapping |
| Index terms: | renewable energy, body of knowledge, visualization, green building, state of the art, developed country, sustainable building material, methodology, sustainable building, mapping, global warming, construction practitioner, journal, decoupling, literature review, strategy, science, developing country, construction industry, life cycle, carbon emission, pollution, energy efficiency, data mining, environmental performance |
| Subjects: | spatial and geospatial analysis, research methods, sustainability assessment, management, design practice, sustainable construction, development economics, professional development, systems engineering, environmental health, industry analysis, research dissemination and communication, value management, climate science, sustainable materials, specialized education, sustainability and energy, energy systems, data analysis and analytics, knowledge management, data science |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Business Strategy, Education, International Construction, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here