Does megaproject social responsibility improve the sustainability of the construction industry?

Ma, H; Liu, Z; Zeng, S; Lin, H and Tam, V W Y (2020) Does megaproject social responsibility improve the sustainability of the construction industry? Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(4), pp. 975-996. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: Since megaproject social responsibility (MSR) has received increasing attention in megaproject management and plays critical roles in megaproject practices, the purpose of this paper is to explore how MSR facilitates an improved sustainability of the construction industry. Design/methodology/approach: By integrating multiple theoretical perspectives of transaction cost theory, institutionalism and attention- and resource-based views, and by using survey data of Chinese megaprojects and construction enterprises, this paper offers a theoretical elaboration of and an empirical investigation into the impacts that MSR’s four dimensions exert on industrial improvement in economic sustainability and social responsibility. Findings: The study’s empirical results indicate that MSR has positive impacts on improving the sustainability of the construction industry, and that such positive impacts are weakened by the interactions of primary stakeholders in the megaprojects but are strengthened by the interactions of secondary stakeholders. Practical implications: This paper suggests that managers and policymakers make efforts to governmental guidance, media monitoring and public participation in megaprojects, so as to limit the potential unethical behaviors in megaproject management and enhance the sociopolitical legitimacy that are essential for the sustainability of the construction industry. Originality/value: By analyzing the industrial outcomes of MSR, this paper extends studies on the topic beyond the current literature’s focus on the antecedents of MSR, and it enriches the research on MSR stakeholders by elaborating on the contingent roles of the various stakeholders in megaproject management.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; management; project management; strategic management
Index terms: media, investigation, economic sustainability, monitoring, project management, construction industry, interaction, dimension, methodology, strategic management, legitimacy, megaproject, public participation, social responsibility, resource-based view, transaction cost, manager, survey
Subjects: management, research methods, health safety and environment, project management theory and practice, sociology, industry analysis, behavioral psychology, financial analysis, data collection methods, control systems, practitioner, participation process, strategic project management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, economic analysis
Topics: Organizational Design, Site Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here