Developing intimacy in construction industry groups

Boyd, D and Foss, P (1997) Developing intimacy in construction industry groups. In: Stephenson, P (ed.) Proceedings of 13th Annual ARCOM Conference, 15-17 September 1997, Cambridge, UK.

Abstract

The construction industry is characterised by organisational fragmentation and short term tempory project interactions. This places a very high demand on individuals in project groups.; firstly, on their ability to perform effectively and rapidly in a coordinated manner, and secondly on teir personal satisfaction with work encounters. Many modern construction practices such as partnering rely on the relationships between people and their success is dependent on individuals' abilities to handle these new closer interpersonal interactions. this paper analyses the difficult interpersonal relationships created in construction through a number of socio-psychological models and reveals the consequences on the effeciency and effectiveness of the industry. The concept of 'intimacy' is used provocatively partly as an educational tool to get the industry to challenge its current practice and partly as a desired end state. The advantages of deeper more personally satisfying engagements between people at work, beyond the normal approaches to team building are discussed. The necessary skills to achieve such positive working practices are presented. In particular, the use of these ideas in a post experience Masters programme are analysed to demonstrate the possibilities of creating and using these conditions with construction industry groups. In this programme, individuals learn to give and accept intimacy and become able to facilitate its development within groups. The result is a more effective practice and more satisfied project people.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; teams; intimacy; group processes
Index terms: programme, working practice, fragmentation, satisfaction, team building, partnering, interaction, construction industry, effectiveness, interpersonal relationship
Subjects: business, project delivery, management, performance management, project controls, partnership management, industry analysis, behavioral psychology
Topics: Quality Management, Time Control, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Project Management, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here