Wijekoon, C; Manewa, A and Ross, A D (2020) Enhancing the value of facilities information management (FIM) through BIM integration. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(4), pp. 809-824. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Building information modelling (BIM) provides a robust platform for information management in built environment facilities. However, one of the consequences of the limited application of BIM in facilities information management (FIM) is that the potential value gain through the integration of as-built information during the operations management process has had limited exploration in current practice. The purpose of this paper is to explore the potential impact of BIM to enhance the value of FIM. Design/methodology/approach: A detailed literature review was undertaken to identify BIM application in a construction context, and to develop a framework to investigate the value of information. An interpretative approach was adopted for data collection and analysis. A total of 14 semi-structured interviews were conducted with construction industry professionals to identify how value of FIM can be enhanced through BIM integration. The interview data were analysed using open and selective coding. Findings: The findings confirm that information exchange between the construction and facilities management (FM) phases of a project are important in terms of efficient and effective maintenance of a facility as well as optimising the design task. With these promising benefits, BIM is an efficient mechanism to facilitate construction information exchange. However, there is an uncertainty over the optimum level of information that ought to be on a BIM model for FM purposes. The relationship between different aspects of value is a starting point to filter the required information for each individual project. In contrast, limited awareness of value of information exchange and the potential of BIM enabled FIM during construction is noted. Research limitations/implications: The information exchange considered within this investigation was limited to two key phases of the facility life cycle, namely, construction and FM (in-use). Practical implications: The findings bring insight into an unseen aspect of FM information needs that should be given priority in upcoming BIM developments. Also, it draws attention to how value is concerned in a daily basis beyond monetary terms. Originality/value: The investigation of value enhancement through BIM integration in particular to FIM and ongoing research with new value dimensions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modelling; construction; facility information management; information value |
| Index terms: | life cycle, building information modelling, platform, dimension, construction industry, investigation, built environment, literature review, information exchange, interview, facilities management, operations management, exploration, methodology, integration |
| Subjects: | digital design, research methods, management, information systems, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, organizational analysis, value management, data collection methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics, data analysis and analytics, data science, environmental resource management |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here