Yap, J B H; Leong, W J and Skitmore, M (2020) Capitalising teamwork for enhancing project delivery and management in construction: Empirical study in Malaysia. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(7), pp. 1479-1503. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Teamwork in the construction industry has attracted much attention from both academic and industrial circles. Most importantly, improving team effectiveness will increase the likelihood of successful project delivery. Recognising the factors influencing team dynamics is important for enhanced team performance. Design/methodology/approach: Based on a detailed literature review, a survey questionnaire containing 10 aspects and 25 attributes of teamwork relevant to construction is used to collect feedback from Malaysian construction practitioners from client, consultant and contractor organisations to prioritise these hypothesised variables. The data are then subjected to reliability analysis, descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, and frequencies), a one-sample t-test, the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA and exploratory factor analysis. Findings: The significance of these aspects and attributes is then presented. The three most crucial aspects are “project performance”, “decision-making capability” and “problem-solving ability”. The most influential attributes are “effective communication between project team members”, “efficient team leadership”, “well-defined team responsibilities and roles”, “clear team goals and objectives” and “good collaboration between all project leaders”. The Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA reveals five attributes having statistically significant differences with respect to company size, namely “clear team goals and objectives”, “commitment to the project”, “adequate resources”, “team or task processes” and “creativity and innovation”. Six underlying dimensions are found, comprising (1) participative engagement and task commitment; (2) team responsibility structure and accountability; (3) culture of trust and respect; (4) leader's skills and abilities; (5) top management support; and (6) synergic working environment. Practical implications: The identification of these dimensions for team effectiveness provides rigorous basis for formulating useful team-building strategies for integrating a collaborative environment among project stakeholders and consequently improving project performance. Originality/value: This paper bridges the identified knowledge gap concerning the dimensionality of teamwork attributes in construction-based setting and adds to existing knowledge of how team effectiveness can be leveraged to improve project performance in the construction management literature.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; dimensions; project management; team effectiveness; teamwork; temporary project team |
| Index terms: | statistics, dimension, construction industry, team leadership, project team, project management, team performance, project delivery, empirical study, team dynamics, project performance, deviation, Malaysia, creativity, contractor organization, teamwork, reliability analysis, team effectiveness, collaboration, decision-making, top management, methodology, questionnaire, project stakeholder, strategy, literature review, commitment, accountability, construction practitioner, survey, exploratory factor analysis |
| Subjects: | Geography, professional development, project management theory and practice, management, research methods, industry analysis, liability law, innovation and creative processes, statistical analysis, sociology, decision analysis, reliability engineering, practitioner, data collection methods, mathematical modelling, organization, data analysis and analytics, financial and cost management, project delivery, health monitoring assessment and metrics, psychology |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Procurement, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here